• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Blockchain Legal Digest

The Source for Blockchain Legal News & Opinion

  • About
  • Contact

Is the SEC Bullying Kik?

June 14, 2019 By Bruce Antley

Is the SEC lawsuit against Kik a step too far? Photo by PlusLexia.com | CC By 2.0

The Securities and Exchange Commission has filed what could be a landmark lawsuit accusing messaging app maker Kik with violating U.S. securities laws.

The lawsuit stems from Kik Interactive’s sale of blockchain-based tokens, which raised about $55 million for Kik, which had been struggling financially.  The SEC alleges that Kik failed to register the tokens, as required by U.S. law.

“By selling $100 million in securities without registering the offers or sales, we allege that Kik deprived investors of information to which they were legally entitled, and prevented investors from making informed investment decisions,” said Steven Peikin, Co-Director of the SEC’s Division of Enforcement in a press release.  “Companies do not face a binary choice between innovation and compliance with the federal securities laws.”

The lawsuit, though, may help to establish clarity in what has been a murky area: are issuers of initial coin offerings required to comply with the same registration and disclosure requirements that traditional securities, such as stocks and bonds, must fulfill. Congress has not addressed the issue with legislation, and the SEC’s directives and litigation has not offered much clarity. Until the filing of the Kik lawsuit, the SEC had focused its litigation efforts on cases that involved not only unregistered tokens but also alleged fraud.

Some are questioning whether the lawsuit against Kik goes too far by seeking punishment for behavior that fell into a gray zone.

The SEC lawsuit is not a surprise, but still it’s a shame. Unlike many other companies that held ICOs, Kik was not a scam or a fly-by-night operation. As Fortune reported in 2017, the company had been experimenting with tokens for years with “Kik Points,” a type of digital money that traded hands up to 300,000 times a day. The SEC’s decision to come down heavy on Kik came in the name of protecting investors, but it also risks punishing early innovators in the blockchain economy.

Does the SEC’s Lawsuit Against Kik Go Too Far?

Predictably, Kik thinks the SEC’s legal arguments are flawed:

Our response to SECs filing: https://t.co/cA8E9n5oTT To summarize: they have backed off commenting on anything about how Kin is being used today, they have flawed legal arguments on the original Kin sale, and they are bending the facts to tell a story that is grossly misleading

— Ted Livingston (@ted_livingston) June 4, 2019

And some thorough analysis:

OKAY SO I just made my way through the 49-page complaint that the SEC filed against Kik- if you want an annotated guide to cut through the legalese, why certain arguments and facts are being made, what this all means, read along with me here: https://t.co/JcIq1OnJml

— Katherine Wu (@katherineykwu) June 4, 2019
Share by Email
Facebook
Google+
Twitter
LinkedIn

Filed Under: Uncategorized Tagged With: Crypto, kik, SEC

Primary Sidebar

Search

About

Founded by longtime media and tech lawyer, Bruce Antley, Blockchain Legal Digest is the source for news and information about blockchain technology and the law, including cryptocurrency, ICOs, smart contracts and other innovations.

Follow Bruce on Twitter

Check back later

Recent Posts

  • On hiatus…
  • Blockchain in the Covid Era
  • Top Blockchain Regulatory Stories of 2019
  • Crypto expert charged with violating U.S. Sanctions against North Korea
  • Understanding real contracts: a guide for smart contracts coders. Part 3: The Money.

Disclaimer

This site does not provide legal advice; consult a lawyer about your particular situation.  Opinions do not necessary reflect those of the author’s employer.

Copyright © 2025 4IR Publishing LLC

Privacy Policy - Terms and Conditions